Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Economia. Mostrar todas as mensagens
Mostrar mensagens com a etiqueta Economia. Mostrar todas as mensagens

terça-feira, 13 de janeiro de 2026

IA, geopolítica e fraude marcam cibersegurança em 2026


A cibersegurança em 2026 está a evoluir num contexto marcado pela aceleração da Inteligência Artificial (IA), pelo aumento das tensões geopolíticas e por desigualdades crescentes no acesso a recursos e competências, segundo o Global Cybersecurity Outlook 2026. O relatório do Fórum Económico Mundial conclui que a colaboração continua a ser um fator determinante para reforçar a resiliência coletiva num ambiente cada vez mais fragmentado.

Uma das principais conclusões do estudo, que se baseia num inquérito global a mais de 800 líderes de cibersegurança, executivos de topo e decisores públicos de 92 países, complementado por workshops e entrevistas com especialistas do Fórum Económico Mundial, revela que a IA assume um papel central na chamada “corrida ao armamento” da cibersegurança. Cerca de 94% dos inquiridos identificam a IA como o principal motor de mudança na cibersegurança no próximo ano. Embora a tecnologia esteja a ser usada para melhorar a deteção e resposta a incidentes, 87% dos participantes consideram as vulnerabilidades associadas à IA o risco de cibersegurança com crescimento mais rápido em 2025. Em paralelo, a percentagem de organizações que avaliam a segurança das suas ferramentas de IA subiu de 37% em 2025 para 64% em 2026.

Geopolítica no centro do risco
O relatório indica que a geopolítica surge como outro fator estruturante, com 64% das organizações já a considerarem ataques motivados por fatores geopolíticos nas suas estratégias de mitigação de risco. Entre as maiores organizações, 91% ajustaram as suas estratégias de cibersegurança em resposta à volatilidade geopolítica. Apesar disso, a confiança na preparação nacional para responder a grandes incidentes continua a diminuir, com 31% dos inquiridos a manifestarem baixa confiança na capacidade dos seus países para lidar com ataques a infraestruturas críticas.

A fraude digital assume também um peso crescente, visto que cerca de 73% dos participantes afirmam que eles próprios ou alguém do seu círculo foi afetado por fraude digital em 2025. Para os CEO, este tipo de fraude tornou-se a principal preocupação, superando o ransomware, enquanto os responsáveis de segurança continuam a destacar o ransomware e os riscos na supply chain como ameaças prioritárias.

O relatório evidencia ainda um fosso persistente na resiliência entre organizações e regiões. Embora 64% das entidades indiquem cumprir os requisitos mínimos de resiliência, apenas 19% consideram ultrapassar esse patamar. A escassez de competências em cibersegurança continua a ser um dos principais fatores de desigualdade, afetando sobretudo pequenas organizações, o setor público e regiões como a América Latina, Caraíbas e África subsaariana.

Ao longo de cinco edições, o Global Cybersecurity Outlook tem documentado a crescente interligação entre cibersegurança, economia e geopolítica. A edição de 2026 reforça que a cibersegurança deixou de ser uma função exclusivamente técnica para se tornar uma prioridade estratégica e económica, com impacto direto na confiança, na inovação e na estabilidade social.

O estudo conclui que reforçar a resiliência exige uma abordagem que vá além do investimento tecnológico, assente numa governação eficaz, no desenvolvimento de competências, na partilha de informação e na cooperação entre os setores público e privado, considerados essenciais para enfrentar um cenário de ciberameaças cada vez mais complexo e global.

quinta-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2025

18 dezembro - Dia Internacional dos Migrantes



Assinala-se hoje, dia 18 de Dezembro, o Dia Internacional dos Migrantes.

Fomos um país de emigrantes. Não podemos fingir que não sabemos o que isto significa. Nas últimas semanas Portugal indignou-se. E bem. Uma rede foi desmantelada por explorar imigrantes. Pessoas. Seres humanos. Gente que veio à procura do que tantos portugueses também procuraram durante décadas: uma vida melhor. 
Convém não termos memória curta.

Fomos um país de emigrantes. Milhões de portugueses sentiram frio em França, medo na Alemanha, solidão no Luxemburgo, saudades em Angola, no Brasil, na Suíça. Fugiam da pobreza, do regime do Estado Novo, da falta de futuro.
Não era escolha. Era sobrevivência.

Hoje o mapa mudou. Mas a dor não.

Os imigrantes que chegam a Portugal também sentem frio em Lamego, Paços de Ferreira, Anadia, Beja ou Alenquer. Também sentem medo. Também têm saudades da mãe. Também trazem a vida inteira numa mala e a esperança num contrato que muitas vezes não existe.

Ser migrante, com I ou com E, é um acto de coragem. E explorar essa coragem é uma vergonha colectiva. Este não é um tema de direita ou de esquerda.
Não é um debate de teclado fácil nem de likes rápidos.
É um teste à nossa humanidade, à nossa memória e aos nossos valores.

Se fomos emigrantes, não podemos aceitar ser exploradores.
Se exigimos dignidade lá fora, temos de garantir dignidade cá dentro.

Porque nenhum país é verdadeiramente desenvolvido enquanto fecha os olhos à desumanização dos mais frágeis.

E isto não é política. É consciência.

Os trabalhadores estrangeiros representam um importante contributo para a Segurança Social em Portugal.
Em 2023, as contribuições sociais dos imigrantes representaram mais de 2,6 mil milhões de euros.
No ano passado, em 2024, esse contributo foi de 3,6 mil milhões de euros, um valor recorde (os brasileiros representam 36,7% desse total, seguindo-se os indianos com 6,6%, os nepaleses com 4,3%, os cabo-verdianos com 3,9% e os angolanos com 3,5%).
A quantia que os imigrantes colocam nos cofres da Segurança Social é cinco vezes superior ao que lhes é pago em prestações sociais. Fonte

A mobilidade humana acompanha a história da humanidade como um caminho de superação, adaptação e procura de novas oportunidades. Num contexto global marcado pela interligação entre países e culturas, a migração continua a desempenhar um papel determinante na transformação social, económica e cultural das sociedades.

Ainda assim, muitas pessoas migrantes vivem em contextos de vulnerabilidade, enfrentando discriminação, exclusão e obstáculos no acesso a direitos fundamentais como a saúde, a habitação, a educação, a justiça e a participação cívica.

Este ano, sob o tema “A minha grande história: culturas e desenvolvimento”, somos convidados a reconhecer cada experiência migratória como parte essencial do desenvolvimento coletivo. Valorizar estas histórias é também um apelo à promoção de políticas mais equitativas, ao reforço da cooperação e à criação de respostas especializadas que assegurem proteção, dignidade e igualdade de oportunidades para todas as pessoas.

Em 2005, compreendendo que as pessoas migrantes vítimas de crime apresentam necessidades específicas que exigem um apoio especializado, a APAV criou a Unidade de Apoio à Vítima Migrante e de Discriminação (UAVMD) em Lisboa.

A partir de 2024, este serviço passou a designar-se APAV SAFE — Apoio a Vítimas Estrangeiras, de Crimes de Ódio, de Tráfico e Exploração de Pessoas, sendo concebido para responder às necessidades específicas de pessoas de nacionalidade não portuguesa, incluindo imigrantes, refugiados, requerentes de asilo, turistas ou pessoas temporariamente no país, que tenham sido vítimas de crime ou violência, independentemente da sua situação legal ou administrativa.

É ainda uma resposta especializada na intervenção com vítimas de tráfico de seres humanos, diferentes formas de exploração, crimes de ódio e discriminação, bem como práticas tradicionais nefastas, como a mutilação genital feminina, o casamento forçado ou crimes de honra.

Sediada nos Serviços de Apoio à Vítima de Lisboa, a APAV SAFE consolidou-se como unidade central de referência, assegurando apoio direto às vítimas e suporte técnico aos restantes serviços da Associação.

Ao longo de 20 anos, o trabalho desenvolvido tem contribuído para uma intervenção mais ajustada, informada e digna, reforçando o acesso das vítimas aos seus direitos e a proteção de pessoas em situação de especial vulnerabilidade.

sábado, 6 de dezembro de 2025

Portugal engana-se. Diverge, empobrece e finge crescer



Nenhum país se renova enquanto continuar a expulsar os competentes, os íntegros e a promover quem vive das conveniências e das redes de interesse, escreve o economista Óscar Afonso.

⚡ECO Fast
Portugal tem registado uma frágil convergência em relação à média da União Europeia, mas enfrenta uma divergência estrutural que se agrava.
Os dados da Comissão Europeia revelam que, entre 1999 e 2024, Portugal perdeu 5,2 pontos percentuais no nível de vida relativo, contrastando com o progresso de várias economias de leste.
Sem reformas estruturais profundas, o país continuará a descer no ranking europeu, com previsões de empobrecimento relativo e emigração de talentos qualificados.

Portugal tem registado, nos últimos anos, alguma convergência de nível de vida em relação à média da União Europeia (UE) nos dados oficiais da Comissão Europeia (CE). Contudo, esse progresso revela-se muito frágil — porque assenta em fatores conjunturais que mascaram fragilidades estruturais: Programa de Recuperação e Resiliência (PRR), turismo e a vaga de imigração descontrolada, além da imagem de destino seguro para turismo e investimento face à guerra na Ucrânia — e insuficiente para compensar a trajetória de divergência desde o início do milénio (entre 1999 e 2024), o foco da análise desta crónica. A divergência é ainda maior quando se corrigem os dados para refletir números mais atualizados da população residente, refletindo a vaga de imigração recente.

O contraste torna-se particularmente evidente quando comparado com o percurso das economias de leste, que protagonizaram um notável processo de aproximação ao nível de vida europeu, ultrapassando vários países que, em 1999, se situavam claramente à sua frente, incluindo Portugal. Acresce que estes países entraram bastante mais tarde na UE, tendo por isso recebido muito menos fundos — que, ao contrário de Portugal, souberam transformar em produtividade, rendimento e progresso para a generalidade da população.

Enquanto no leste europeu os apoios comunitários foram canalizados para modernizar economias inteiras, por cá serviram demasiadas vezes — para usar uma expressão suave — para alimentar interesses instalados, reproduzir privilégios e fortalecer uma elite facilitadora. E o mais triste é que nada disto é novo: Está, infelizmente, nos nossos “genes institucionais”. É um padrão antigo e persistentemente português, amplamente documentado por Antero de Quental, Eça, Garrett, Ramalho Ortigão, Fernando Pessoa, Saramago, Sophia ou Vergílio Ferreira — todos eles descrevendo, ao longo de séculos, a mesma teia de favoritismos, patrimonialismo e captura do Estado por minorias privilegiadas.

Uns investiram para criar futuro, nós desperdiçámos para preservar um sistema. Em suma, enquanto as economias de leste aproveitaram os fundos para convergir, Portugal continua a avançar aos solavancos, preso a um modelo que favorece a esperteza oportunista em detrimento do mérito, do trabalho sério e da inteligência criadora.

Somos um país onde demasiadas portas se abrem não pelo que se sabe ou pelo que se faz, mas por quem se conhece — um padrão que os nossos maiores escritores denunciaram, com uma precisão quase profética, muito antes de existir UE. E assim, geração após geração, mantemo-nos reféns dos mesmos bloqueios estruturais, enquanto outros que começaram muito atrás já vão muito à frente.

segunda-feira, 17 de novembro de 2025

No Dia Internacional para a Erradicação da Pobreza, Francisco Louçã explica: "Para que servem os milionários?"



Um bilionário serve para jogar ao monopólio com a vida de milhares ou milhões de pessoas e com o planeta. E serve para alimentar a ganância destes em subir no ranking dos milionários.

Esta sexta-feira assinala-se o Dia Internacional para a Erradicação da Pobreza. Apesar da taxa de risco de pobreza ou exclusão social ter diminuído no país, este continua a ser um "problema estrutural", refere a EAPN Portugal.

A taxa de risco de pobreza ou exclusão social em Portugal é a mais baixa desde 2015. Ainda assim, cerca de 1,8 milhões de portugueses vivem em famílias com um rendimento mensal inferior a 632 euros, segundo um relatório da Pordata divulgado esta sexta-feira, Dia Internacional para a Erradicação da Pobreza.

A mesma fonte, na qual constam dados até 2023, indica que os idosos são o grupo etário em que a taxa de risco de pobreza mais tem aumentado, tendo passado de 17,1%, em 2022, para 21,1%, em 2023. Verifica-se que um em cada cinco idosos em Portugal vive sozinho com um rendimento bruto inferior a 632 euros, ou faz parte de um agregado familiar em situação de pobreza.

Depois das famílias monoparentais com crianças, que continuam a ser “as que revelam maior vulnerabilidade”, destaca a Pordata, seguem-se as pessoas que vivem sozinhas - estas registam um agravamento da taxa de risco de pobreza que passou de 24,9%, em 2022, para 28,6%, em 2023.

Já 44% dos desempregados residentes em Portugal encontram-se em agregados familiares com rendimentos abaixo do limiar de pobreza.

Oeiras lidera no rendimento médio mensal
A região metropolitana de Lisboa lidera a tabela dos residentes em Portugal com rendimentos médios mensais mais elevados (1.375 euros), com o munícipio de Oeiras a registar o maior rendimento médio (1.637 euros). Por outro lado, a região do Tâmega e Sousa regista o valor mais baixo (883 euros).

Segundo dados do relatório "Pobreza e Exclusão Social 2025", no âmbito do Dia Internacional para a Erradicação da Pobreza, o arquipélago dos Açores é outra das regiões mais vulneráveis do país com 28,4% da população em risco de pobreza ou exclusão social. Também a península de Setúbal se destaca como a região mais vulnerável no Continente (21,8%).

A EAPN Portugal "sublinha que o número absoluto de pessoas em risco [de pobreza] se mantém, de forma persistente, acima dos dois milhões" e que tal reforça que "a pobreza continua a ser um problema estrutural do país". Refere, ainda, que as mulheres continuam a representar a maioria das pessoas em situação de pobreza (56%).

A nível da União Europeia, Portugal ocupa a 19º posição entre os 27 países do bloco no rendimento mediano mensal das famílias, tendo sido ultrapassado pela Letónia. Este ranking é liderado pelo Luxemburgo e pela Dinamarca, países com os rendimentos mais elevados.

domingo, 16 de novembro de 2025

Dia Mundial dos Pobres — e dos culpados

"Hoje celebra-se o dia mundial dos pobres.
Curioso: nunca celebramos o dia mundial
dos que produzem pobreza.
Erguem-se palcos, discursos, fotografias.
Fala-se de “apoio”, “solidariedade”, “valores”.
Mas ninguém pronuncia os nomes
dos que lucram com a miséria,
dos que apertam orçamentos
para que sobrem dividendos,
dos que tratam gente colada ao chão.

A pobreza não cai do céu —
é fabricada.
Tem autores, assinaturas, logótipos,
programas eleitorais,
conivências silenciosas.

E corporações que, ano após ano,
garantem que os mesmos continuem pobres
e os bilionários continuem a decidir.

Hoje, os poderosos dirão
que “ninguém fica para trás”.
Mentira: alguém fica para trás
porque alguém está sempre a empurrar.

É mais fácil decorar a palavra “equidade”
do que taxar fortunas;
mais fácil erguer campanhas
do que erguer salários;
mais fácil proclamar "caridade"
do que enfrentar interesses.

Pobreza não é tragédia humana —
é estratégia populista e ódio aos pobres
É o resultado frio
de permitir que o lucro vença o direito,
que o mercado vença a vida,
que a indiferença vença a vergonha.

Um dia mundial não chega.
O que falta é romper o silêncio cúmplice
e enfrentar e denunciar todos os dias
os que fazem da pobreza
uma máquina de produção contínua,
uma estratégia calculada,
um rendimento garantido.

Se é para lembrar os pobres,
então que nos lembrem também dos culpados.
E que se lhes retire — finalmente —
o privilégio de continuar a produzi-los."

quinta-feira, 6 de novembro de 2025

Presidente do Fórum Económico Mundial alerta: bolha de IA pode ameaçar empregos


O presidente do Fórum Económico Mundial, Børge Brende, fez um alerta nesta quarta-feira (05): o mundo deve ficar atento a três possíveis bolhas nos mercados financeiros, incluindo a bolha de IA. A fala aconteceu durante visita do executivo a São Paulo.

Brende também alertou que, apesar de aumentar a produtividade, a tecnologia pode ameaçar empregos de escritório.

Bolha de IA preocupa
Conforme reportado pelo Olhar Digital, ações de empresas de tecnologia tiveram uma queda expressiva nas bolsas ao redor do mundo. Altos investimentos em IA e a supervalorização de big techs deixaram investidores com um pé atrás.

Diante desse cenário, Brende alertou que o mundo deve ficar atento a três possíveis bolhas de mercado: a de inteligência artificial, a de criptomoedas e a de dívidas.

Ele também afirmou que governos não estavam endividados como estão agora desde 1945. As expectativas com a IA e os altos investimentos ignoraram preocupações com taxas de juros, inflações e turbulências, o que também balançou o mercado esta semana.

Durante encontro com jornalistas, o presidente do Fórum Económico Mundial ainda afirmou que a tecnologia traz possibilidades de ganhos de produtividade, mas alertou que “trabalhadores de escritórios podem ser mais facilmente substituídos por essa IA”.

Segundo a agência de notícias Reuters, ele citou cortes recentes em empresas como Amazon e Nestlé.

Brende ainda destacou que as mudanças tecnológicas levam ao aumento da produtividade. E que a produtividade “é a única maneira de aumentar a prosperidade ao longo do tempo”.

Assim, você poderá pagar salários melhores às pessoas e terá mais prosperidade na sociedade. Børge Brende, presidente do Fórum Econômico Mundial, à agência Reuters

A reviravolta veio depois que as big techs divulgaram resultados positivos e com expectativa de mais investimentos em IA, mas especialistas voltaram a alertar sobre a “bolha de IA”.
Segundo o The Guardian, sete big techs tiveram queda na bolsa no mesmo dia: Nvidia, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Tesla, Alphabet (proprietária do Google) e Meta.

Chefes de bancos e analistas destacaram uma possível correção no mercado de ações e a “bolha de IA”, num cenário que os grandes investimentos no setor ainda não deram o retorno esperado.

Confira os detalhes aqui

terça-feira, 28 de outubro de 2025

O carvalhal


«Nos cumes mais elevados encontram-se, nos lugares húmidos, os bosques de vidoeiros e sobre os rochedos as sorveiras. Nos lugares mais baixos atingem-se no norte de Portugal os bosques de carvalhos, em que as árvores estão suficientemente próximas para darem sombra aos caminhos e suficientemente afastadas para permitirem a passagem.
Os vales do Minho estão cobertos de bosques de carvalhos contínuos. Em seguida surge a região dos bosques de castanheiros, os verdadeiros bosques deste país, cujas árvores se tocam pela folhagem. Ornam as encostas da Serra do Marão, da Serra da Estrela, na direcção do Fundão, da Serra de Portalegre e de Monchique. No sopé das grandes montanhas encontram-se os pomares, onde a cultura dos frutos é sinal de região fria. Mais abaixo surgem a árvore da cortiça, o carrasco, o pinheiro-marítimo, em seguida o limoeiro e finalmente a laranjeira. A oliveira está ainda mais espalhada, encontra-se perto dos vidoeiros do Gerês e ao lado das laranjeiras, perto de Lisboa.»
baseado nas viagens de Hoffmansegg e Link

terça-feira, 21 de outubro de 2025

Dia Mundial da Economia de Energia - A energia mais limpa é a que não se consome


O Dia Mundial da Economia de Energia foi criado em 21 de outubro de 1973, logo após a crise mundial do petróleo que começou nesse mesmo ano. O aumento repentino do preço e a escassez deste recurso essencial despertaram a consciência global sobre a dependência energética e a necessidade urgente de racionalizar o consumo.

Esta data convida-nos a repensar a forma como usamos a energia — em casa, no trabalho e nas cidades — e a adotar hábitos mais eficientes e sustentáveis. Economizar energia não significa apenas gastar menos; significa usar melhor, reduzir desperdícios e proteger o planeta.

Todos sabemos que economizar energia é bom para o planeta. Mas, e para o negócio? Neste Dia Mundial da Economia de Energia, vale a pena lembrar que cada kWh poupado é mais um passo dado para empresas se tornarem mais eficientes, competitivas e até mais inovadoras. Porque inovar também é repensar processos, otimizar recursos, fazer mais com menos. A energia mais limpa é, afinal, a que não se consome.

A verdade é que a eficiência energética deixou de ser apenas uma exigência legal: tornou-se uma alavanca estratégica. Não se trata apenas de instalar tecnologia verde ou de cumprir regulamentos; trata-se de criar uma cultura de consumo consciente. É perceber que cada processo, cada equipamento e cada decisão de investimento podem gerar impacto direto nos resultados da empresa. E essa transformação começa dentro de casa: ao mapear processos, identificar desperdícios e agir de forma proativa, as empresas conseguem produzir mais com menos, reduzir emissões e aumentar a competitividade.

Um exemplo claro desta abordagem é a monitorização em tempo real. Quando conseguimos acompanhar, minuto a minuto, como a energia é consumida, deixamos de reagir a problemas e começamos a preveni-los. Os dados deixam de ser números isolados e transformam-se em decisões inteligentes, traduzindo-se em ação e, consequentemente, em resultados. É aqui que se esconde o verdadeiro valor da eficiência: na capacidade de transformar informação em vantagem concreta.

Outro vetor estratégico é a eletrificação da indústria. Portugal tem dado passos importantes, mas ainda há muito a fazer. A eletrificação só é eficaz se estiver integrada com soluções digitais, energias renováveis e armazenamento. Esta transformação exige visão de longo prazo e um trabalho contínuo de melhoria, um processo incremental, mas consistente, capaz de gerar valor real e sustentável.

Depois, a economia de energia também é um exercício de liderança. Empresas que olham para a eficiência como uma prioridade estratégica não estão apenas a cortar custos: estão a construir resiliência, a reforçar a reputação e a abrir portas para novos investimentos.

No fundo, a mensagem é simples: criar hábitos, investir em soluções inteligentes e integrar a eficiência energética na estratégia do dia a dia não é apenas bom para o planeta, é essencial para as empresas que querem liderar o futuro.

⚡ Algumas ações simples que fazem diferença:
  • Substituir lâmpadas incandescentes por LED.
  • Desligar aparelhos e carregadores da tomada quando não estão em uso.
  • Aproveitar a luz natural e melhorar o isolamento térmico das casas.
  • Optar por transportes sustentáveis.
  • Escolher equipamentos com selo de eficiência energética.

quarta-feira, 15 de outubro de 2025

Ranked: The World’s Most Sustainable Economies in 2025



Alguns priorizam infraestruturas robustas e mercados abertos, enquanto outros se concentram no reforço da protecção laboral, no combate à desigualdade de rendimentos ou no investimento em salvaguardas ambientais. Nesta perspetiva, o Índice fornece informações valiosas sobre o amplo espectro de abordagens e compensações que definem a procura de um comércio sustentável.

Estudo completo aqui

quinta-feira, 9 de outubro de 2025

Iniquidade insustentável - mostra relatório recente no Reino-Unido



O trabalhador médio do Reino Unido levaria 52 anos de rendimento para se juntar aos 10% mais ricos. Um aumento em relação aos 38 anos em 2006-08. Os ricos compram influência política. Os governos ajudam os ricos. Os 20% mais pobres contribuem com uma maior proporção do rendimento do que os 20% mais ricos. As desigualdades obstruem o crescimento económico e alimentam a agitação social. [Fonte]

Isto vai chegar a nós.

terça-feira, 7 de outubro de 2025

Novo estudo mostra que a expansão das plantações de eucalipto no País Basco levantou preocupações em relação à biodiversidade, particularmente, aos efeitos adversos sobre as comunidades aviárias


A expansão das plantações de eucalipto no País Basco levantou preocupações em relação à biodiversidade, particularmente, aos efeitos adversos sobre as comunidades aviárias. Este estudo examinou as diferenças na diversidade de espécies de aves em três grandes ecossistemas florestais (florestas nativas, plantações de pinheiros e plantações de eucalipto) e avaliou os fatores que influenciam estas variações, incluindo a vegetação, a paisagem circundante, a estrutura da floresta, a localização e a madeira morta. 
Os nossos resultados indicaram que as plantações de eucalipto suportam uma menor riqueza e abundância de espécies de aves em comparação com as florestas nativas e as plantações de pinheiros, e que a composição de espécies de aves nas plantações de eucalipto era distinta dos outros dois ecossistemas florestais, especialmente em comparação com as florestas nativas. Embora as plantações de pinheiros acolhessem algumas espécies de aves florestais, as comunidades aviárias permaneceram distintas das das florestas nativas, enfatizando o papel insubstituível das florestas nativas como habitat das aves. 
Além disso, uma análise das interações entre aves e plantas sugeriu que a maioria das interações entre plantas e aves eram com plantas nativas, uma vez que as espécies de plantas e a diversidade estrutural das florestas nativas fornecem um conjunto mais amplo de nichos para as aves, em comparação com comunidades mais simplificadas de plantações florestais. 
Além disso, estas interações ocorreram principalmente com plantas de frutos silvestres em comparação com espécies arbóreas. 
O nosso estudo destaca a necessidade urgente de conservação e restauro das florestas nativas para manter a diversidade aviária e sublinha a importância de estratégias de gestão florestal sustentável que priorizem a conservação da biodiversidade.

quarta-feira, 1 de outubro de 2025

A Demagogia da Direita - usar o exemplo da Irlanda para defender que Portugal seria um país rico caso cobrasse impostos mais baixos sobre os lucros das empresas

É desconcertante como grande parte da direita portuguesa continua a usar o exemplo da Irlanda para defender que Portugal seria um país rico caso cobrasse impostos mais baixos sobre os lucros das empresas.
Como se a única diferença entre Portugal e a Irlanda fossem as taxas de imposto:
- como se os níveis de escolaridade na Irlanda não fossem há décadas superiores aos portugueses 
- e ainda são: 83,5% dos irlandeses adultos têm pelo menos o 12º ano, enquanto em Portugal são 61,3%, a taxa mais baixa da UE (ver gráfico);
- como se os irlandeses não falassem inglês nativo (a mesma língua que falam os chefes das empresas de sectores sofisticados que lá investem desde há décadas);
- como se o Estado irlandês não tivesse seguido, desde 1958, uma estratégia persistente de atracção de investidores americanos em sectores específicos de alta tecnologia (enquanto nós insistimos na ideia de disparar para todo o lado a ver se chove).

Mais desconcertante ainda é insistirem em usar números que não passam de uma ficção. Não são só os cépticos que o dizem: é o próprio Instituto Nacional de Estatística irlandês (o CSO). A questão é fácil de perceber: o facto de a Irlanda funcionar como uma espécie de paraíso fiscal leva muitas empresas a registar no país activos que rendem lucros, mas que não deixam nenhuma actividade no país.

Por exemplo, grandes multinacionais, sobretudo nos sectores das tecnologias digitais (Google, Apple, Meta) e farmacêutico (Pfizer, Johnson & Johnson) registam na Irlanda os lucros associados à propriedade intelectual, inflacionando as contas nacionais sem corresponder a actividade produtiva real no território.

Por isso, o governo e o CSO (o instituto nacional de estatística lá do sítio) passaram a dar destaque a medidas alternativas, como o Rendimento Nacional Bruto Modificado (RNB*), que exclui os efeitos artificiais da transferência de activos e lucros de multinacionais.

Segundo o CSO, o valor do RNB* da Irlanda em 2024 era pouco mais de metade (57%) do valor do PIB nesse ano (ver aqui). Estão a ver o efeito que isto tem na análise dos níveis relativos de riqueza, dos níveis de endividamento do país, ou do peso das despesas públicas na economia - tudo variáveis cujos indicadores usam o PIB no seu cálculo?

Podemos ter uma conversa séria sobre a relação entre competitividade e fiscalidade, claro, assumindo sempre que há diferentes desenhos possíveis para um sistema fiscal que se quer eficiente e justo. Mas já paravam com tanta demagogia, não era?

Além disso, A emigração irlandesa ainda é elevada e isso é demonstrativo de que a riqueza não é devidamente distribuída.

Entretanto, os irlandeses que trabalham em Inglaterra mesmo os altamente qualificados são discriminados. São vistos como os indostânicos em Portugal. Mão-de-obra barata, sem acesso a cargos de topo nas empresas. Sei bem do que falo pois trabalhei durante anos em várias empresas britânicas onde testemunhei sempre o mesmo padrão ( Carlos Vargas) . Os irlandeses são imigrantes e tratados dentro do padrão de discriminação "natural".

sábado, 27 de setembro de 2025

Boicote a Uber


A Uber acaba de anunciar uma parceria com a Flytrex, uma empresa israelita que fabrica drones autónomos para entrega de alimentos, prometendo um serviço mais rápido e sustentável. Os testes começam no final de 2025. É um grande salto para a tecnologia de entregas... ou não?


Este acordo rapidamente se tornou um foco de controvérsia.
Críticos e ativistas pró-Palestina estão a apelar ao boicote da Uber, destacando as raízes israelitas da Flytrex. O cofundador da Flytrex, Yariv Bash, fundou anteriormente a SpaceIL, a organização sem fins lucrativos por detrás da primeira missão privada de Israel à Lua, a Beresheet.

A empresa opera no mercado israelita através de uma filial local, a Fly Zipline Israel, estabelecida para implementar o seu serviço de entrega por drones no país

Uber Takes to the Skies: Uber has announced a partnership with drone startup Flytrex – including Uber’s first-ever investment in drone delivery – to start airlifting Uber Eats orders by autonomous drone. The service will pilot in select U.S. markets by late 2025, aiming to deliver meals in minutes via the sky [1] [2].

Proven Drone Tech: Flytrex brings a track record of over 200,000 drone deliveries in U.S. suburbs and is one of only four companies authorized by the FAA for beyond-visual-line-of-sight flights [3] [4]. Its drones carry up to ~6.5 pounds and can fly about a 5-mile round trip, lowering orders by cable right to customers’ backyards [5].

Race in the Skies: Uber’s move heats up the drone delivery race alongside Amazon’s Prime Air, Alphabet’s Wing, Zipline, and others. Wing and Walmart are expanding drones to 100 stores across major cities [6] [7], while Amazon is regrouping after pilot programs, planning new city launches following regulatory approvals [8] [9].

Cleared for Takeoff: New regulations are making drone delivery easier. The FAA just proposed rules to streamline longer-range drone flights, replacing case-by-case waivers [10]. Still, safety and noise are key concerns – early Amazon drones drew “giant mosquito” noise complaints [11] – but companies are deploying quieter models and traffic management systems to share the skies safely.

What It Means: If successful, drone delivery could slash delivery times and emissions, getting food and essentials to your door in 10–15 minutes instead of 30–60 [12] [13]. But big challenges remain: costs are high (around $13.50 per drone drop vs. $2 for a van delivery today) and drones can only handle small loads and fair weather [14] [15]. Even so, industry leaders say this is an “inflection point” – a future of on-demand flying couriers is closer than ever.

Uber & Flytrex Team Up to Launch Drone Deliveries
An Uber Eats delivery drone developed with Flytrex takes flight. The partnership aims to air-drop meals to Uber customers in minutes, marking Uber’s entry into autonomous aerial logistics [16] [17].

Uber’s latest delivery is headed skyward. In a press release titled “Uber Partners with Flytrex to Launch Drone Delivery”, the San Francisco tech giant announced a strategic alliance with Flytrex – an Israeli-founded drone delivery startup – to begin testing food deliveries by drone through Uber Eats [18]. This move marks Uber’s first investment in drone technology and a major step into autonomous aerial logistics [19] [20]. According to Uber, pilot programs will roll out in “Uber Eats’ pilot markets in the U.S. by the end of the year” 2025 [21], indicating that some customers could start receiving drones at their doorsteps within months.

What does the partnership entail? Uber isn’t building its own drones; instead it’s leveraging Flytrex’s proven autonomous drone system and integrating it with Uber’s massive delivery platform [22]. Flytrex will handle the hardware and flight operations, while Uber provides the ordering app, logistics network, and customer base. The goal is a “fully integrated end-to-end experience” where you could tap “order” in Uber Eats and have a drone dispatched, pick up your meal, and air-drop it to your home in minutes [23] [24]. Uber says this aerial option will complement its existing car, bicycle, and robotic couriers, expanding Uber’s delivery network beyond roads to the air [25]. It’s essentially Uber’s next leap toward a “flexible, multimodal delivery network” that includes sidewalk robots, self-driving cars, and now drones [26] [27].

Flytrex, for its part, brings serious credentials to the table. The company has been a pioneer in drone deliveries, operating in several states (including North Carolina and Texas) and even abroad since the late 2010s [28]. In fact, Flytrex has completed over 200,000 deliveries in the past three years – mainly flying takeout orders to suburban backyards – demonstrating the viability of its service at scale [29] [30]. Its drones have FAA authorization for Beyond Visual Line of Sight (BVLOS) flights, meaning they can legally fly beyond the operator’s direct view [31] [32]. (Only four companies have that distinction so far, Flytrex included, giving Uber a partner already vetted for regulatory compliance.) Flytrex’s drones are electric quadcopters equipped with a delivery box (often emblazoned with partner logos like Uber Eats or DoorDash) and a winch system to lower packages by tether from about 80 feet up, so they don’t have to land in yards [33] [34]. They can carry roughly 6–6.6 pounds of payload (about 3 kg), enough for a couple of meal orders or a bag of groceries, and fly approximately a 3–5 mile radius (5+ miles round trip) at speeds around 30–40 mph [35] [36]. Flytrex is already working with other delivery apps (notably DoorDash in the Dallas suburbs) and has built out drone “stations” at shopping centers and restaurants where orders are prepared for aerial pickup [37] [38]. By joining forces with Uber Eats, Flytrex can instantly tap into a huge network of restaurants and hungry customers, while Uber gains a ready-to-deploy drone fleet with years of real-world testing behind it.

Both companies are touting big benefits: faster delivery times, broader reach, and reduced car traffic on the roads. Uber’s President of Autonomous Mobility and Delivery, Sarfraz Maredia, said the partnership is about “bringing the speed and sustainability of drone delivery to the Uber Eats platform, at scale, for the first time”, envisioning that together Uber and Flytrex will “reshape how food, convenience items, and other essentials move through cities” [39]. Flytrex’s Executive Chairman, Noam Bardin, was similarly bullish, calling autonomous drones “the future of food delivery – fast, affordable, and hands-free” and noting that “together, we’re building the infrastructure for a future where autonomous systems seamlessly move goods through our communities”, making instant delivery the “new standard” [40]. The companies highlight that drone drops can happen in just a few minutes from takeoff, cutting delivery times dramatically (no more waiting 30–45 minutes for that sushi bowl to drive through traffic) [41] [42]. Fewer driver trips also means lower costs and emissions in the long run – a single small drone uses a fraction of the energy of a gas-powered scooter or car, and it’s all-electric [43] [44]. And with less cars or mopeds hustling around town for deliveries, congestion and accident risk could decline too, especially in dense urban areas.

While Uber hasn’t yet announced which cities or regions will get the drone pilot first, it hinted at existing Uber Eats test markets. Given Flytrex’s current operations, industry watchers speculate initial service may launch in suburban areas of North Carolina or Texas (where Flytrex already has drone hubs and FAA waivers) [45]. That could include suburbs of Raleigh, NC or the Dallas-Fort Worth area, both of which have seen Flytrex drones in action. Uber said there are “no additional details to share at this time” on pilot locations, likely because approvals and logistics are still being ironed out [46] [47]. But the timeline is aggressive – “by the end of the year”, meaning Uber and Flytrex plan to be up and flying in late 2025. If all goes well, this could expand to more cities in 2026 and beyond, potentially making drone delivery a standard option in the Uber Eats app whenever conditions permit.

Notably, this isn’t Uber’s first flirtation with drones. Uber Eats actually experimented with drone delivery back in 2019 in a pilot program around San Diego [48]. At that time, Uber used in-house prototypes to carry meals (famously testing with McDonald’s fries and Big Macs) to designated drop-off points where couriers would then hand-deliver to the customer. However, that early trial remained very limited and was eventually shelved due to regulatory hurdles and the decision to wind down Uber’s Uber Elevate division when the company was tightening its focus and finances [49]. (Uber Elevate was Uber’s ambitious initiative for flying taxis and delivery drones, which Uber sold to Joby Aviation in 2020 amid cost-cutting, effectively pressing pause on Uber’s aerial plans.) Now, a few years later, the regulatory climate has improved and Uber is taking a second shot – this time by partnering and investing in Flytrex rather than going it alone [50] [51]. It’s a sign that Uber sees autonomous delivery tech maturing to the point where it can add real value to its platform. Indeed, Uber has recently been “re-engaging” with advanced transport tech across the board: partnering with Waymo to deploy self-driving ride-hail cars in cities like Phoenix and Las Vegas, teaming up with Nuro and Motional for autonomous delivery vehicles, and now re-entering the drone space via Flytrex [52]. In Uber’s vision, the future of delivery is multimodal – a hybrid fleet of human drivers, self-driving cars, sidewalk robots, and flying drones, all coordinated through Uber’s apps to get anything to anyone in the most efficient way possible [53] [54]. The Flytrex deal checks the aerial box in that strategy.

“Autonomous technology is transforming mobility and delivery faster than ever before… Together [with Flytrex], we’ll reshape how food, convenience items, and other essentials move through cities.” – Sarfraz Maredia, Uber’s head of Autonomous Delivery [55]

“Autonomous drones are the future of food delivery – fast, affordable, and hands-free… Together, we’re… making faster, safer, and more sustainable delivery the new standard.” – Noam Bardin, Flytrex Executive Chairman [56]

The New Drone Delivery Landscape: Uber vs. Amazon, Google’s Wing, Zipline & More
Uber’s drone debut comes at a moment when drone delivery is finally lifting off in a broader sense. For years, the idea of little flying robots zipping around with packages felt like a futuristic gimmick – famously, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos hyped Prime Air drone deliveries on TV back in 2013, but it took a decade for those promises to near reality [57] [58]. Now in 2025, we’re seeing something of a drone delivery boom, with multiple major players launching or expanding services. Uber entering the fray with Flytrex is a big deal, but they’re hardly alone. Here’s how the major drone delivery efforts compare:Amazon Prime Air – Ambition Meets Turbulence: E-commerce behemoth Amazon has arguably invested the most in drone delivery, and it’s been a long journey with ups and downs. Amazon’s drones – distinctive hexagonal tilt-rotor aircraft – began testing a decade ago. They notched a first-ever drone delivery in 2016 (a TV streaming device to a customer in the UK) and secured an FAA air carrier certificate in 2020, allowing limited commercial trials [59]. In late 2022, Amazon finally launched pilot programs in College Station, Texas and Lockeford, California, aiming to deliver small packages (under 5 pounds) to customers’ yards within a few miles of its warehouses [60] [61]. The initial community reception was mixed: while some residents were excited, others complained about the noise from the drones’ loud propellers, likening the sound to a “giant nagging mosquito” buzzing overhead [62]. By 2023, Amazon had delivered only a few thousand packages via drone – far fewer than hoped – and began rethinking its approach [63] [64]. This year (2025), Amazon shut down its College Station operation after failing to find a new launch site acceptable to locals [65], and paused its Arizona service near Phoenix to implement software upgrades following a test incident [66]. But Amazon isn’t giving up; instead, it’s shifting strategy to integrate drones into its larger fulfillment network. The company announced plans to embed Prime Air drone delivery at existing same-day delivery hubs – for example, adding drones at an Amazon facility in the Phoenix suburb of Tolleson [67]. Amazon also revealed expansion plans for three other Texas cities (including the Dallas metro), plus cities like San Antonio, Waco, Kansas City and Detroit in the near future [68] [69]. Crucially, Amazon secured FAA approval in 2024 to fly drones beyond visual line of sight (BVLOS) around College Station [70], a template it says will help it operate in more densely populated areas going forward. Amazon’s latest drone model, the MK30, is reportedly quieter and more weather-resistant than earlier versions, addressing some past issues [71]. The company’s vision remains bold: Amazon wants to eventually deliver 500 million packages a year by drone, promising customers certain items in 30 minutes or less [72]. But to get there, it must overcome substantial challenges – not least of which are high costs (one analysis found Amazon’s drone deliveries in 2025 cost an estimated $63 each to operate, vastly higher than ground delivery) and the task of winning over communities and regulators at scale [73]. For now, Uber’s approach is more modest – targeting food deliveries in limited areas – but if Amazon can crack the code on larger-scale parcel delivery, it will set the tone for the whole industry.
Alphabet’s Wing – Scaling Up with Walmart:Wing, owned by Google parent Alphabet, has emerged as one of the most successful drone delivery services to date, especially in terms of operational scale. Wing’s drones are a unique hybrid design – essentially small autonomous planes with wings and multiple rotors that allow vertical takeoff and hover. They’re relatively lightweight and can carry about 2–3 pounds per order (think a coffee, a burrito, or a small grocery bag) [74]. Wing made headlines in 2019 with the first FAA-approved commercial drone deliveries in the U.S., ferrying Walgreens prescriptions and FedEx packages to residents in Christiansburg, Virginia. But Wing’s biggest success story is abroad: in Australia, Wing has been running a popular drone delivery service in Canberra and Logan (a suburb of Brisbane) for several years, completing well over 100,000 deliveries there and integrating into everyday life (locals routinely get their morning coffees and takeaway lunches via Wing drones) [75] [76]. That international experience gave Wing a head start when it began ramping up U.S. operations. In 2023, Wing partnered with Walmart in the Dallas–Fort Worth area of Texas, and this year they announced a massive expansion – rolling out drone delivery from 100 Walmart stores across new cities including Atlanta, Charlotte, Orlando, Tampa and Houston [77] [78]. By mid-2025, Wing and Walmart were already serving parts of DFW from 18 stores, and delivering thousands of orders per week with an average delivery time under 19 minutes from click to drop-off [79] [80]. This expansion is being called “the world’s largest drone delivery network” in the making [81] [82]. Wing CEO Adam Woodworth said the company has officially moved “out of the pilot and trial phase and into scaling up this business”, describing this five-fold growth with Walmart as Wing’s “next big bite of the apple” [83]. Wing’s approach to scaling is interesting: their drones are highly automated and relatively low-cost, and one human pilot can oversee up to 32 active drones at once under current FAA approvals [84]. That’s key to keeping costs down – as Woodworth notes, the path to profitability is flying a lot of drones without linearly increasing staff [85] [86]. The more deliveries they do, the more they can spread out fixed costs like maintenance and monitoring. Wing’s latest software even enables drone-to-drone handoffs and staging, creating a “Wing Delivery Network” that functions almost like a rideshare system for drones, dispatching the nearest available drone to pick up orders. With Walmart onboard (literally, Wing drones launch from Walmart store parking lots or rooftops and drop items directly to customer yards), Wing is focusing on “small, lightweight everyday goods” – from a carton of eggs to a bag of oranges or a box of diapers [87] [88]. Customers opt in via a simple app, confirm their drop spot (backyard, front driveway, etc.), and the drone cruises at up to ~65 mph to their location, lowers the package on a tether, then flies back to the store [89] [90]. It’s fast, contactless, and novel enough that many first-timers are delighted by the sight of a space-age “delivery plane” swooping in. Woodworth said after years of treading water due to regulations, the industry has hit “planetary alignment” now – demand, tech, partners, and rules are finally intersecting to allow real growth [91]. Indeed, DoorDash’s drone program lead Harrison Shih noted that in places like suburban Brisbane where Wing operates, drone drop-offs have quickly become “part of everyday life”, proving the mainstream potential [92]. For Uber, Wing’s partnership with Walmart is an instructive example: it shows that big retail integrations and multi-city operations are possible when the technology is robust and regulators are on board. Uber might not have physical stores like Walmart, but it has a vast network of restaurants and couriers – and perhaps in the future, small “drone depots” at cloud kitchens or Uber Eats hubs could mirror Wing’s model.

Zipline – From Life-Saving Medicine to Burritos: Zipline is often spoken of in reverent terms in the drone world – it’s the pioneer that has been doing drone delivery at scale longer than anyone, albeit in a different context. Founded in 2014, Zipline started by delivering blood and medical supplies in Rwanda, East Africa. Over the past decade, it has built an impressive record: more than 1.4 million deliveries completed globally (as of early 2025) and a staggering 100+ million autonomous miles flown by its drone fleet [93] [94]. Zipline’s early strategy took advantage of less restrictive airspace in countries like Rwanda and Ghana to prove its technology – which paid off tremendously in lives saved and expertise gained [95] [96]. Zipline’s drones are distinct: until recently they were fixed-wing aircraft (shaped like small planes) launched via catapult and deploying parachutes to drop packages at precise locations (like remote clinics). These could carry around 4 pounds of cargo and fly up to 50–60 miles each way (120 miles round trip), far outpacing the range of multicopter drones [97] [98]. In 2023, Zipline unveiled its next-gen “Platform 2” system, which pairs a long-range drone with a robotic droid that reels down on a tether to gently deliver packages into spaces as small as a patio table [99] [100]. This allows precision deliveries in suburban and urban areas without needing a big field for parachute drops. Now Zipline is aggressively expanding in the U.S. market: it has partnered with Walmart to deliver health and wellness products in Arkansas (since 2021) and, as of 2024–25, to customers around the Dallas–Fort Worth area using the new tethered droid system [101] [102]. It’s also working with major healthcare networks (like delivering prescriptions for Intermountain Healthcare in Utah and vaccines in North Carolina) and even food chains like Sweetgreen, Panera Bread, and Chipotle. In fact, in August 2025 Chipotle launched “Zipotle” – a drone delivery service in the Dallas suburbs in partnership with Zipline, cheekily promising to fly burritos to your home in minutes [103] [104]. Early Zipotle customers place orders through the Zipline app; a Chipotle worker loads the burrito bowl or tacos into Zipline’s system at the restaurant, and a drone then whisks it to your address, hovering about 300 feet up and lowering the meal by tether to the ground [105] [106]. (Yes, your burrito essentially skydives into your yard, minus the parachute.) Chipotle’s tech chief said this allows serving customers in spots that are “traditionally challenging to serve, including backyards and public parks”, highlighting how drones unlock new delivery locations away from roads [107] [108]. Zipline’s extensive real-world experience gives it credibility on safety – its drones have been flying reliably alongside manned aircraft and even in adverse conditions in Africa for years. In July 2024, Zipline received the FAA’s first-ever approval for a drone airspace deconfliction and traffic management system [109], a milestone that will help multiple drones fly in the same area safely. As of 2025, Zipline has FAA Part 135 certification (like Wing, Amazon, and UPS’s Flight Forward), enabling routine BVLOS operations in the U.S., and it’s scaling up operations in states like Michigan, California, and Washington soon. For Uber, Zipline represents both a competitor and perhaps a potential ally – Zipline’s focus is broader than food (they target retail, e-commerce, medical, etc.), but they clearly have interest in restaurant delivery now (the Chipotle trial). We may see some overlap in service areas if both expand (for instance, Dallas is becoming a hotspot with Wing, Flytrex, and Zipline all active). But Zipline’s long-range prowess could complement Uber’s network too – imagine Uber Eats tapping Zipline for longer-distance deliveries to rural customers while Flytrex handles the local suburb hops. Regardless, Zipline’s success has proven drones can be safe, effective, and even life-saving. It’s no longer just theory – they’ve integrated into supply chains (delivering 65% of Rwanda’s blood supply by drone in some regions) and shown drones can operate at mass scale when given the opportunity [110] [111].

Other Notable Players: Beyond the “big four” of drone delivery (Amazon, Wing, Zipline, Flytrex), there are several others worth mentioning. UPS was actually the first U.S. company to get full FAA approval for drone deliveries in 2019 via its UPS Flight Forward division. UPS partnered with Matternet, a drone maker, to ferry medical samples between hospital campuses in North Carolina – a service that’s still ongoing and expanding to other hospital systems. Matternet’s quadcopter was also the first drone to receive full FAA type certification in 2022, meaning its design is approved like a regular aircraft for standard operations [112]. Walmart, the nation’s largest retailer, has been notably aggressive: in addition to Wing and Zipline, Walmart invested in DroneUp, a Virginia-based startup that is now operating drone delivery from dozens of Walmart stores in states like Arizona, Florida, and Arkansas. Walmart says it has completed over 150,000 drone deliveries in the U.S. since 2021 across its various partners – top items include ice cream, eggs, and Reese’s candy, which speaks to the demand for quick snacks and essentials by air [113] [114]. DoorDash, Uber Eats’ chief rival, has also dipped into drones: it ran a pilot with Wing in Australia and is working with Flytrex in the U.S. (the same Flytrex that’s now joining Uber) to offer drone delivery of DoorDash orders in the Dallas area [115] [116]. DoorDash’s drone lead mused that while drones won’t carry your 40-pound pet food bag anytime soon, they can handle a lot of smaller orders and “be fairly ubiquitous” alongside traditional delivery – interestingly, DoorDash found that in neighborhoods where they added a drone option, orders for human couriers actually also increased, suggesting drones might spur overall demand rather than simply cannibalize existing service [117] [118]. Internationally, there are active drone delivery programs in Ireland (startup Manna delivers Starbucks and takeout in multiple towns), Israel (where companies like Flytrex and others have government-backed pilots in Tel Aviv), Canada (remote community supply drops), China (JD.com and Ele.me have tested drone drops to rural villages and high-rise rooftops), and the Middle East (the UAE and Saudi Arabia have shown strong interest in drone logistics, with test corridors in Dubai). In short, the drone delivery ecosystem is expanding rapidly in 2025. Uber’s partnership with Flytrex puts it in a strong position – aligning with a proven provider – to compete in this burgeoning space. As these companies race forward, we’re effectively seeing a giant experiment unfold in real time: What works best? Small drones or bigger ones? Store-launched or depot-launched? Urban or suburban focus? By this time next year, we’ll have even more data as pilots convert to full-fledged services reaching millions of people [119] [120].

A DoorDash employee holds a package as a Wing drone (overhead) prepares for a delivery drop in Frisco, Texas. Major retailers and delivery apps are experimenting with drones: Alphabet’s Wing has partnered with Walmart and DoorDash to scale up services across multiple U.S. cities [121] [122].
Skies Opening Up: The Regulatory & Infrastructure Landscape

One reason drone delivery has taken so long to get off the ground (quite literally) is the regulatory environment. In the United States, airspace is tightly controlled by the Federal Aviation Administration, and for years regulations did not readily accommodate small autonomous drones zipping over neighborhoods. Companies could only operate under strict limits: drones had to remain within the pilot’s visual line of sight, avoid flying over people, and only operate in daytime good weather, unless granted special waivers. To do something like deliver to homes a few miles away (out of sight), companies had to go through arduous case-by-case approvals or trials. That’s why drone delivery in the U.S. circa 2018–2022 was mostly confined to tiny pilot programs in rural or sparsely populated areas.

However, 2025 is shaping up to be a turning point on the regulatory front. In August 2025, the FAA proposed a new rule to allow routine beyond-visual-line-of-sight (BVLOS) operations for drones [123]. This proposed rule (which is open for public comment and could be finalized next year) essentially would create a framework so that approved drone operators don’t each have to obtain a special exemption or be certified as a full airline each time they want to fly longer distances. Up until now, only a handful of companies obtained a formal Part 135 air carrier certification for drone delivery – including Wing, Zipline, Amazon, and UPS (and by extension partners like Flytrex under their wings) – effectively a drone airline license that allowed them to carry goods for hire beyond line of sight [124]. Everyone else had to piggyback on those or stick to line-of-sight only. The new FAA rules aim to “streamline the process” and let more operators fly drones over longer ranges without as much red tape, as long as they meet safety standards [125] [126].

In parallel, the FAA has been running programs like the Integration Pilot Program (IPP) and its successor BEYOND, in which companies like Flytrex, Zipline, and Wing worked with local governments to test drone deliveries and gather data for regulators. Those programs helped demonstrate technologies like remote ID (electronic license plates for drones) and detect-and-avoid systems to prevent mid-air collisions. In July 2023, the FAA’s rule requiring most drones to carry Remote ID transmitters took effect, providing a way for authorities (and the public) to identify drones and their operators in the air – an important step for accountability and security. By July 2024, as noted, Zipline even got FAA approval for an air traffic management system that coordinates multiple drones’ flight paths in the same airspace [127].

All these pieces are gradually building an infrastructure for drone traffic akin to air traffic control. NASA and industry partners have been working on UTM (Unmanned Aircraft Systems Traffic Management) prototypes for years, envisioning cloud-based systems where drones automatically file flight plans, get routing around no-fly zones, and separate themselves from other aircraft. Companies like Wing have developed their own fleet management software – Wing actually open-sourced parts of its system to help standardize drone corridors. The FAA’s cautious approach (“crawl, walk, run,” as they say) is now starting to pay off with more clarity in rules. Wing’s CEO Woodworth acknowledges the process has been slow but ultimately “leads to everybody… building higher quality things” due to the high safety bar [128]. In other words, while bureaucracy slowed early progress, it also forced the technology to mature quietly until it’s truly ready. As evidence, the safety record so far has been strong – there have been a few drone crashes (one Amazon drone ignited a brush fire during a test, and a Wing drone had a controlled crash landing in a tree once, for instance), but no injuries reported from drone delivery operations to date. The FAA wants to keep it that way as drone traffic scales 100x.

Internationally, regulations vary widely, which influenced where drone delivery took off first. In Rwanda and Ghana, regulators basically embraced Zipline’s proposals enthusiastically, given the humanitarian benefits, and allowed drone operations in rural areas under flexible oversight (no gauntlet of approvals needed as in the US) [129] [130]. In Australia, the aviation authority CASA worked closely with Wing to approve suburban deliveries – Australia’s relatively open approach let Wing reach thousands of customers quickly, whereas the same might have been years slower in the U.S. The European Union, via EASA, has been developing a risk-based framework with categories (Open, Specific, Certified) for drone ops. They are also rolling out U-space, designated airspace blocks with digital drone traffic services, which countries like Ireland and Finland are leveraging to enable delivery trials. In Ireland, for example, startup Manna has made tens of thousands of drone deliveries of coffee and food in small towns under a special permit, and is now eyeing expansion to larger cities as EU regs solidify. China has allowed JD.com to use drones in remote provinces for years, and companies like Alibaba’s Ele.me have done limited urban drone deliveries (like to rooftop pickup points in cities). Each region’s rules shape where drones can go: generally, less populated or more regulated environments saw drone delivery first, but now it’s edging into big cities as authorities gain confidence.

Besides airspace regulations, there’s the matter of infrastructure on the ground. Drones need places to launch and land (or drop). Solutions have included landing pads, rooftops, or simply carrying and lowering via tether (the latter avoids needing any landing space at the destination). Amazon built dedicated drone launch facilities for its pilots – essentially small drone airports with pads, maintenance hangars, and observation systems. (Their first ones were standalone sites, which, as noted, had issues with community acceptance; now Amazon prefers to co-locate drones at existing warehouses to blend in.) Wing’s model has drones stationed at stores like Walmart: they often use a portable rooftop box or a parking lot tent as the base where drones charge and wait for orders, and employees load packages into a little box that the drone winches up. Flytrex set up drone stations in shopping centers, working with local restaurants: a drone sits on a raised platform; when an order comes, a runner attaches the package to the drone’s cable; the drone then takes off autonomously, flies to the customer’s house, lowers the package, and returns. These “drone ports” are becoming a new kind of logistics infrastructure. We might see mini drone-ports at malls, grocery stores, or even on delivery vans (one concept is trucks that act as motherships, launching drones for the last leg to remote homes).

To manage many drones, companies are also investing in robust fleet operations centers – think air traffic control but for hundreds of tiny craft. They monitor weather (drones generally don’t fly in high winds, heavy rain or snow, or near thunderstorms for safety), and can intervene if a drone has an issue. Advances in autonomous “detect-and-avoid” technology are critical: drones use cameras, radar, and other sensors to spot and avoid obstacles like birds, power lines, or other aircraft. The FAA will require proof that drones can meet certain risk thresholds (like no more than 1-in-a-million chance of a serious incident) before wide approval. But those proofs are underway: for instance, in May 2024 Amazon touted that its drones’ automated avoidance tech was validated enough that the FAA let them fly BVLOS in Texas [131].

Another consideration is community infrastructure and acceptance. Noise is a factor – companies are engineering quieter propellers (Amazon claims its new model is 7 dB quieter than the last) and often flying at higher altitudes to disperse sound. Privacy is sometimes raised as an issue: some residents worry about drones with cameras overhead. Most delivery drones do carry cameras or sensors for navigation, which may incidentally capture images of people or property below. Amazon faced this in College Station where people voiced concerns about being filmed; Amazon responded that footage is used only for navigation and not stored for other purposes, but it did highlight a need for transparent privacy practices [132] [133]. Local governments are starting to designate drone-friendly zones or conversely no-drone zones (though in the U.S., cities can’t outright regulate airspace – that’s federal – but they can restrict takeoff/landing sites).

In summary, the regulatory and infrastructure puzzle pieces are falling into place, albeit gradually. The FAA’s new BVLOS rule (expected to be finalized in 2026) will likely require operators to have specific certifications, use remote ID, and equip drones with approved detect-and-avoid tech – but it will open the door for broader operations without case-by-case permissions [134] [135]. Companies like Uber and Flytrex will still need to obtain waivers or certifications in the interim for their pilot, but since Flytrex already has the FAA permissions and a solid safety record, the barriers are lower. If Uber’s trial succeeds, it could pave the way for an expansion right as the new rules kick in. The infrastructure will expand too: expect to see more drone launch pads on store rooftops, dedicated flight lanes in the skies, and perhaps drone mailboxes or landing mats at homes (some companies have floated the idea of customers having a small helipad mat that signals the drone where to drop – though most current systems are accurate enough to drop on a front door step without special equipment). Just as the early internet needed broadband cables and routers everywhere, the drone delivery era will need its own physical and digital scaffolding – and 2025 is the year we’re really starting to build it.
Tech, Economic and Environmental Impacts: Will Drones Deliver on the Promise?

Beyond the gee-whiz factor of having your pad thai delivered by robo-copter, drone delivery carries significant implications for technology, the economy, and the environment.

Technology: On the tech front, drone delivery pushes the envelope in autonomy, robotics, and aviation. These delivery drones are essentially flying robots that combine advanced navigation algorithms, GPS, cameras, and sensors to pilot themselves without a person on board. They must make real-time decisions – adjusting for wind gusts, navigating around unexpected obstacles (like that news helicopter or a flock of geese), and homing in on precise delivery points. Advances in machine vision and AI have been critical in allowing drones to identify safe drop spots (e.g., recognizing a flat open area like a driveway or backyard versus a tree-covered lot). There’s also a lot of redundancy built-in for safety: multiple motors, multiple sensors, parachutes or propeller-stop mechanisms in some models to mitigate any malfunction. As these systems evolve, we’re likely to see improvements in payload capacity and range. Today’s typical delivery drone hauls about 2–5 pounds and flies maybe 10 miles round trip [136] [137]. Future drones, possibly hybrid designs or even small eVTOL (electric vertical takeoff and landing) craft, might carry 20–50 lb grocery orders or pizza for the whole office. Companies are already testing larger drones: Zipline’s next-gen can carry 8–10 lbs; others like Elroy Air are building mid-size cargo drones for 300 lb payloads (though those are more for logistics than instant delivery). Battery technology is a limiting factor – drones need lightweight, high-density batteries to maximize flight time. We might see trickle-down benefits from the electric car industry (better batteries) and even new power sources like hydrogen fuel cells for drones to extend range. On the user side, integration of drones into apps and logistics software is an interesting challenge: Uber and others will need to intelligently route orders either to a human or a drone depending on factors like distance, weight, weather, and demand. There’s a lot of backend optimization and data crunching involved in deciding, say, if a drone should take a particular order (maybe because it’s small and the roads are congested) versus assigning a nearby driver.

Economic: The economics of drone delivery are a hot topic. In theory, automating deliveries should cut costs – no driver to pay, fuel costs are low (electricity for charging is cheap), and a single operator can supervise many drones. In practice, at the current scale, drone delivery is still quite expensive per order. As noted by supply chain researchers, each drone delivery today might cost on the order of $10–$15 (or more) in operational expenses, compared to just a couple bucks for bundling an order onto a typical driver route [138]. Professor Shakiba Enayati, who studies drone logistics, estimated it’s around $13.50 per package by drone vs. $2 by traditional vehicle right now [139]. Why the discrepancy? For one, the utilization rate is low – a driver can deliver multiple orders in a single trip, whereas a drone usually handles only one order at a time [140] [141]. Also, the overhead costs of running a drone program (tech development, regulatory compliance, trained personnel, maintenance, insurance) are high while volume is low. However, those economics can change with scale. If a network of hundreds of drones is each doing several deliveries per hour, the cost per delivery will plummet. Wing’s strategy of one pilot for 30 drones is explicitly to make drone drops cheaper than human labor for small items – labor is a huge fraction of delivery cost normally. Plus, automation tends to get cheaper over time: hardware costs drop and operations streamline. A hopeful stat: Flytrex’s CEO has said the goal is to make drone delivery “ten times more affordable” than car delivery in suburbs, by achieving high volume and eliminating human labor except for packing the order [142] [143]. For Uber, embracing drones could eventually improve its margins on delivery (which are historically slim) – if, say, an Uber Eats drone can handle an order at a lower cost than paying a gig courier, Uber could retain more of the fee. That said, nobody’s looking to replace couriers entirely. Drones have clear limitations: they can’t easily deliver heavy or large items (a party tray of drinks, or a bulk Costco order, for example), and they struggle in complex urban environments like dense downtown high-rises (imagine trying to drop to an apartment window – not feasible with current tech). Harrison Shih of DoorDash noted drones aren’t going to be carrying “a 40-pound bag of dog food” to your house in the foreseeable future [144]. So, human drivers and bikers will remain crucial for a broad range of deliveries. In many ways, drones will fill a niche: super-fast delivery of relatively small orders in areas where that’s efficient. If anything, early signs show drones can expand the delivery market – by making it so convenient, people might order more often, even for little things. For example, Wing says one of the most popular drone orders in Dallas has been a single bottle of cold medicine or a bag of cough drops – items people need urgently but wouldn’t normally order for delivery due to wait times. Drones enable new use cases. For merchants, this could be a boon: restaurants might reach more customers on the fringes of delivery zones, and retailers could offer 15-minute delivery for urgent needs as a premium service. There’s also an economic development angle: building out drone networks creates new types of jobs – drone maintenance technicians, remote pilots, operations managers – often tech-skilled positions. Flytrex and others have to employ local teams in the areas they serve to handle the hardware and regulatory compliance. Over time, if drones reduce delivery costs for businesses, those savings might pass to consumers or allow higher wages for the remaining human couriers (perhaps they take the larger orders while drones handle small ones). The balance between automation and jobs is delicate, but so far drones seem to complement delivery drivers rather than directly replace them. In Frisco, Texas, a restaurant owner offering drone delivery via DoorDash said his overall orders went up 15% after drones launched – suggesting it brought him new customers or more orders, benefiting his business and also increasing work for human drivers on other orders [145] [146].

Environmental: One of the touted benefits of drone delivery is the potential to reduce the environmental footprint of last-mile logistics. Drones are fully electric (battery-powered), so they emit zero tailpipe emissions during flight. If they charge from a relatively clean grid or solar panels, their carbon footprint per delivery can be very low. A small drone carrying a 2-pound package uses far less energy than driving a 3,000-pound car a few miles to deliver the same item. Studies have indicated that for lightweight deliveries (under a few kg), drones tend to produce less CO₂ than delivery trucks or cars, especially if the drones replace single-purpose vehicle trips (like one driver delivering one meal) [147] [148]. Additionally, by taking vehicles off the road, drones can alleviate traffic congestion – indirectly cutting emissions from idling and stop-and-go traffic. In dense cities, a network of bikes, robots, and drones might eventually handle many deliveries, leaving fewer diesel vans clogging the streets. Zipline often highlights the social and environmental impact: in Rwanda, their drone service saved people from driving hours on rough roads to get medical supplies, cutting down on fuel use significantly.

That said, drones are not impact-free. A sky full of drones raises concerns about noise pollution, which is an environmental quality issue. One or two drones are barely noticeable, but if dozens are constantly buzzing over a neighborhood, residents might not be happy. Companies are racing to design quieter rotors (some use clever aerodynamic tweaks to reduce that whining noise). Amazon’s newer drones supposedly are a bit quieter after community feedback [149]. Regulations might enforce noise limits in the future. There’s also resource use: drones have a limited lifespan and use batteries that eventually need replacing – large-scale drone use means more battery production and disposal (though these are small batteries compared to EVs). Still, relative to gasoline consumption of vehicles, it’s a smaller issue. Another consideration: efficiency of scale. A delivery van can carry 50 packages and deliver them in one route – which might be more energy-efficient overall than 50 drones each doing a separate trip for one package. So the net environmental benefit can depend on the scenario. Drones shine in serving many individual orders that would otherwise each be separate car trips (like on-demand food). If they started doing what postal trucks do (many deliveries in one area per trip), it might not be as efficient. For now, the use cases drones are targeting (food, urgent small items) are ones where typically an individual courier would be dispatched anyway, so replacing that with an electric drone is generally a win for emissions.

One often overlooked environmental angle: faster drone deliveries could reduce food waste or spoilage for certain goods (delivering blood or medicines quickly preserves their viability, delivering hot meals faster keeps them from being discarded due to quality issues). Also, if drones can reduce the need for restaurants to have fleets of gas-powered scooters (as is common in some cities), that cuts down on both emissions and noise from those.

In sum, the environmental impact of drone delivery looks largely positive, especially as renewable energy grows. Drones could help cities reach climate goals by decarbonizing a chunk of last-mile logistics. They won’t eliminate delivery vans entirely – heavy loads will still need trucks – but they can carve out a piece of the delivery pie and make it greener. Of course, ensuring responsible use (noise control, avoiding sensitive wildlife areas, etc.) will be important. We might see designated “green flight corridors” for drones that avoid nature reserves or limit flights at night to not disturb people and animals. But compared to the status quo of countless fossil-fueled delivery runs, delivery drones have the potential to be a notably cleaner solution if deployed thoughtfully.

The Road Ahead: From Pilot Projects to Everyday Sight
As Uber and Flytrex prepare to launch their drones, it’s clear we’re at an inflection point for drone delivery. Industry leaders are optimistic that 2025–2026 will transition drones from novelty to normalcy. “I think that we’re reaching that planetary alignment right now,” Wing’s CEO said of the convergence of demand, tech, and regulatory support [150]. Indeed, with the FAA loosening rules and big retail partnerships in play, the pieces are aligning.

If Uber’s drone pilot is successful, imagine the possibilities for consumers: You open the Uber Eats app and alongside the usual delivery options you see a little drone icon offering “ultrafast drone delivery (eligible items only)”. Maybe you’ll choose it on a busy day when roads are jammed, or late at night when fewer drivers are available. Your order could arrive not by a knock on the door but by a text saying “Your drone is approaching, please stand in your backyard.” A minute later, you hear a gentle hum and watch a package descend from the sky, right into your yard – no driver, no traffic, just dinner delivered with a touch of sci-fi flair.

For Uber, success would mean scaling this beyond just a couple test neighborhoods. They might expand drones to cover wide suburban areas or even dense urban zones if allowed. It could differentiate Uber Eats in the food delivery wars – “Why wait 40 minutes for lukewarm fries if Uber can fly them to you in 10?” Perhaps premium Uber One subscribers get drone deliveries at no extra charge as a perk. And beyond food, Uber could explore using drones on its other platforms: imagine Uber Package deliveries (Uber has a Connect service for sending small items across town – drones could turbocharge that), or even tying into healthcare (medication deliveries) and retail (Uber has been delivering store items via its Cornershop/Postmates arm).

However, there are cautionary notes. We’ve seen timelines slip before – Amazon’s drone dreams were supposed to materialize years ago. Even now, Amazon is recalibrating and hasn’t scaled as fast as hoped due to technical and community hurdles [151] [152]. Regulators move deliberately; the proposed FAA rule will take time to implement, and legal challenges could arise if there are privacy or safety incidents. Public sentiment can also change: one high-profile accident (like a drone crash causing injury) could set back acceptance considerably. Companies will need to be transparent and engage with communities to earn trust. Early surveys show people are intrigued by drones but also voice concerns about privacy, noise, and air traffic. It’s a balancing act to integrate these buzzing couriers into daily life without causing new nuisances.

Then there’s the competitive landscape: With Amazon, Alphabet/Wing, Walmart (with multiple partners), and others all in the fray, there’s a possibility of “drone traffic jams” in the future skies or overlapping services vying for airspace. Coordination will be key – perhaps even partnerships. It’s notable that Flytrex until now worked with DoorDash; now they’re also working with Uber. These platforms might end up sharing drone providers or even infrastructure. Some analysts speculate about a future where independent drone networks service all comers, the way cloud computing does for tech – e.g. one might imagine “Drone Delivery as a Service” companies that handle the flying for any retailer or app. In that scenario, Uber’s role would simply be connecting demand to whichever drone network is available. But for now, Uber partnering directly with Flytrex gives it a dedicated stake.

One thing is for sure: drone delivery will continue to make headlines in the coming months. We’ll see more pilot programs, more regulatory milestones, and likely the first signs of commercial viability at scale. Investors and industry experts are watching closely. There’s a sense that “flying delivery robots” could be an integral part of the on-demand economy in the 2030s, just as rideshare and food apps were in the 2010s. It’s not hard to imagine a future where a good chunk of food deliveries, pharmacy drop-offs, and e-commerce packages for small items are routinely done by air. Children growing up now might find it completely ordinary to see drones hovering with shopping bags, the same way rideshare vehicles became a normal part of city streets.

Uber’s partnership with Flytrex may well be a milestone we look back on as Uber’s entry into the aerial delivery era. It represents a blending of two innovations: Uber’s massive network and demand-generation capabilities, and Flytrex’s autonomous drone tech honed over years. If they can marry those effectively, the result could be a fast, seamless drone delivery service available at the tap of an app – fulfilling Uber’s promise to “get anything, anywhere” for its customers. As Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi has often said, Uber’s mission is to “transport people and things at the push of a button”. With drones, that push of a button might send your pad thai into flight.

For consumers, the coming drone services will be something to try out (who wouldn’t want to at least see their coffee descending from the sky once?). For communities, careful integration will be needed – maybe new rules like designated delivery times or altitudes to address noise, much like we have noise ordinances for trucks. For the environment, it’s a promising shift towards electrification of yet another sector. And for the logistics industry, it’s a new dimension (literally vertical) to optimize. We are essentially witnessing the dawn of aerial last-mile delivery.

In the next year or two, keep an eye out – the drone delivery revolution may be hovering over your neighborhood soon. And when you see that first little flying courier above, you’ll know companies like Uber and Flytrex helped make it possible. The future where “everything arrives in minutes, not hours” [153] could be just around the corner, buzzing its way into our everyday lives.

Sources: Uber Investor News [154] [155]; TechCrunch [156] [157]; Restaurant Dive [158] [159]; CBS News [160] [161]; Dronelife [162] [163]; LA Times / AP [164] [165]; The Drone Girl [166] [167]; Wing Blog [168]; Flytrex release [169]; Chipotle announcement [170].


References

1. investor.uber.com, 2. www.restaurantdive.com, 3. investor.uber.com, 4. www.cbsnews.com, 5. dronelife.com, 6. techcrunch.com, 7. techcrunch.com, 8. dronelife.com, 9. dronelife.com, 10. www.latimes.com, 11. www.latimes.com, 12. investor.uber.com, 13. investor.uber.com, 14. www.latimes.com, 15. www.latimes.com, 16. investor.uber.com, 17. investor.uber.com, 18. techcrunch.com, 19. investor.uber.com, 20. www.restaurantdive.com, 21. investor.uber.com, 22. investor.uber.com, 23. investor.uber.com, 24. investor.uber.com, 25. investor.uber.com, 26. www.restaurantdive.com, 27. www.restaurantdive.com, 28. www.restaurantdive.com, 29. investor.uber.com, 30. www.restaurantdive.com, 31. investor.uber.com, 32. www.cbsnews.com, 33. dronelife.com, 34. dronelife.com, 35. dronelife.com, 36. www.supplychaindive.com, 37. dronelife.com, 38. dronelife.com, 39. investor.uber.com, 40. investor.uber.com, 41. www.supplychaindive.com, 42. investor.uber.com, 43. investor.uber.com, 44. investor.uber.com, 45. www.restaurantdive.com, 46. www.cbsnews.com, 47. www.cbsnews.com, 48. techcrunch.com, 49. techcrunch.com, 50. techcrunch.com, 51. techcrunch.com, 52. www.restaurantdive.com, 53. www.restaurantdive.com, 54. www.restaurantdive.com, 55. investor.uber.com, 56. investor.uber.com, 57. www.supplychaindive.com, 58. www.supplychaindive.com, 59. www.supplychaindive.com, 60. dronelife.com, 61. dronelife.com, 62. www.latimes.com, 63. dronelife.com, 64. dronelife.com, 65. dronelife.com, 66. dronelife.com, 67. dronelife.com, 68. dronelife.com, 69. dronelife.com, 70. dronelife.com, 71. www.latimes.com, 72. www.supplychaindive.com, 73. en.wikipedia.org, 74. www.latimes.com, 75. www.latimes.com, 76. www.latimes.com, 77. techcrunch.com, 78. techcrunch.com, 79. wing.com, 80. wing.com, 81. wing.com, 82. wing.com, 83. techcrunch.com, 84. www.latimes.com, 85. techcrunch.com, 86. techcrunch.com, 87. www.latimes.com, 88. www.latimes.com, 89. wing.com, 90. wing.com, 91. www.latimes.com, 92. www.latimes.com, 93. www.thedronegirl.com, 94. www.thedronegirl.com, 95. www.thedronegirl.com, 96. www.thedronegirl.com, 97. www.latimes.com, 98. www.latimes.com, 99. www.thedronegirl.com, 100. www.thedronegirl.com, 101. www.latimes.com, 102. www.latimes.com, 103. www.cbsnews.com, 104. www.cbsnews.com, 105. www.cbsnews.com, 106. www.cbsnews.com, 107. www.cbsnews.com, 108. www.cbsnews.com, 109. www.zipline.com, 110. www.thedronegirl.com, 111. www.thedronegirl.com, 112. loyaltydrones.com, 113. www.latimes.com, 114. www.latimes.com, 115. dronelife.com, 116. dronelife.com, 117. www.latimes.com, 118. www.latimes.com, 119. wing.com, 120. wing.com, 121. techcrunch.com, 122. www.latimes.com, 123. www.latimes.com, 124. www.cbsnews.com, 125. www.latimes.com, 126. www.latimes.com, 127. www.zipline.com, 128. www.latimes.com, 129. www.thedronegirl.com, 130. www.thedronegirl.com, 131. dronelife.com, 132. www.latimes.com, 133. www.latimes.com, 134. www.latimes.com, 135. www.latimes.com, 136. www.latimes.com, 137. www.latimes.com, 138. www.latimes.com, 139. www.latimes.com, 140. www.latimes.com, 141. www.latimes.com, 142. www.supplychaindive.com, 143. www.supplychaindive.com, 144. www.latimes.com, 145. www.latimes.com, 146. www.latimes.com, 147. investor.uber.com, 148. investor.uber.com, 149. www.latimes.com, 150. www.latimes.com, 151. dronelife.com, 152. dronelife.com, 153. investor.uber.com, 154. investor.uber.com, 155. investor.uber.com, 156. techcrunch.com, 157. techcrunch.com, 158. www.restaurantdive.com, 159. www.restaurantdive.com, 160. www.cbsnews.com, 161. www.cbsnews.com, 162. dronelife.com, 163. dronelife.com, 164. www.latimes.com, 165. www.latimes.com, 166. www.thedronegirl.com, 167. www.thedronegirl.com, 168. wing.com, 169. dronelife.com, 170. www.cbsnews.com